incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: Process question on release votes
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:05:00 GMT
what has been with the rule that an ipmc must forward the VOTE to the incubator pmc when it
gets started, and those members can also cast a binding -1 ?

LieGrue,
strub





On Tuesday, 18 March 2014, 4:10, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
 
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:10 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While not specifically incubator related, was wondering if someone at
>> the incubator may provide me some insight.
>>
>> Right now, release votes cannot be veto'd.  This seems like an
>> oversight IMHO.  If a release candidate is visibly wrong (e.g. bad
>> licenses, or something else), surely the release candidate can be
>> veto'd no?
>>
>
>This is correct - release votes are not veto-able.
>In my opinion if you have a PMC whose members choose to ignore an
>obviously problematic release, especially from a licensing standpoint,
>then you have much bigger problems with the project. In my experience
>two factors come into play:
>1. The release manager, even with a vote that technically passes, will
>not proceed with a vote where there are obvious major problems,
>especially from a legal perspective. They cancel the vote on their own
>accord. No one wants a majorly flawed release shipping.
>2. Other PMC members heap on -1 votes if it remains open for any
>length of time, effectively causing the vote to fail to pass.
>
>If you can't get agreement on the obviously wrong candidate, perhaps
>it's not as obvious why its wrong.
>
>--David
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message