Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E633210AC5 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 12:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94938 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2014 12:21:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94090 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2014 12:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94380 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2014 22:47:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matei.zaharia@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.44 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/fRGs8hRh57eFSZnCU1yGMVh/m8YRM96ft2zVY6LEng=; b=ub5PkTGQnISzU5WwC3HvRCCBxbqsOuXxS43Lx00a4z3ckNAmoqhbl3LI1NdV9lYQ4J Z0ewMb3mDHBTqZBVdroSQaaNGlLQQjGL8O9QmTwQIr5dmZwG7at1krf57rFI7fBaYncv ya3zkwUUIj3uXwArJtUtWX0CzTkMHjGhsu8tk3yyaF0lcmpgKEvwdFWtXYzm8WAQe9Ub 8hGuxSodXlwCcTfom+FAW7a73destVgmCo9faq6EEKM3JUUr9RwMqxlBPeFhPOjSLSdD UCrkPV6NeRXvr0D9ThAehiSB6cZ+9qHzj4niV1hz+3th18eQeSCEMgOi48kXbVtJe0tG N5Vw== X-Received: by 10.68.196.164 with SMTP id in4mr28301396pbc.128.1391899608597; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:46:48 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator From: Matei Zaharia In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 14:46:45 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5552C454-DBB9-4DC6-9A6B-81263825F48B@gmail.com> References: <5ADA0D81-AFC4-4C13-ABCD-9464C27723C7@oracle.com> <9BA99E04-68AF-4023-AC3C-F4F52FB2414D@gmail.com> To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks everyone for the votes. Since we now have accounts for everyone, = I=92ve updated the committer list below to include ASF IDs. Thanks to = INFRA, we also now have both pull request postings and comments on them = forwarded to the our mailing list. ---- snip WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis on clusters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Spark Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation and sharing across distributed applications; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Spark" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Spark Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Spark Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Spark Project: * Mosharaf Chowdhury * Jason Dai * Tathagata Das * Ankur Dave * Aaron Davidson * Thomas Dudziak * Robert Evans * Thomas Graves * Andy Konwinski * Stephen Haberman * Mark Hamstra * Shane Huang * Ryan LeCompte * Haoyuan Li * Sean McNamara * Mridul Muralidharam * Kay Ousterhout * Nick Pentreath * Imran Rashid * Charles Reiss * Josh Rosen * Prashant Sharma * Ram Sriharsha * Shivaram Venkataraman * Patrick Wendell * Andrew Xia * Reynold Xin * Matei Zaharia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matei Zaharia be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Spark, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Spark Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Spark podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Spark podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. ---- On Feb 8, 2014, at 9:02 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Ted and Henry: Thanks for the thoughtful replies and indulging my = concerns. >=20 > +1 (binding) >=20 > --David >=20 > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Henry Saputra = wrote: >> HI David Nalley, >>=20 >> Thank you for your comment and concern, really appreciate it. >>=20 >> As Patrick had mentioned in his reply, this is not a persistent = problem. >> The reminder I sent was about particular topic which could be >> interpreted as design or roadmap topic rather than review for a = patch. >> Rather than reminding an individual or two involved in the = discussion, >> I decided to send email to dev@ list to show by example the open and >> transparent discussions the ASF way. >>=20 >> Hope this gives some more clarification about the state of the = podling >> embracing the ASF way. >>=20 >> - Henry >>=20 >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Patrick Wendell = wrote: >>> Hey All - chiming in as an active Spark committer. >>>=20 >>>> The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the >>>> community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind >>>> folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to = happen >>>> on the mailing list. That's a pretty foundational concept in my = mind >>>> for an Apache project. >>>=20 >>> Henry gave a reminder on the mailing list not because it's a >>> persistent problem but because it never explicitly came up prior to >>> this. We use github for review comments and in one case this week >>> there was a brief discussion that could be interpreted as roadmap - = so >>> Henry just gave a reminder not to do that. I can't imagine why any >>> project would *want* to use github review comments for long term >>> roadmap discussion... it's a terrible medium for that anyways! We = have >>> a very active developer list and that is where these discussions = take >>> place. >>>=20 >>>> The missing account issues are somewhat troubling, but also not = really >>>> within the purview of the podling to fix either; though I find it = odd >>>> that people committed to the podling (and many initial committers) >>>> haven't asked for their Apache account or needed to use it. >>>=20 >>> This is because those people have still contributed a lot of code = via >>> other commiters who merge so it's not an immediate urgency. For >>> perspective I am a committer on two other ASF projects but I've = never >>> personally committed code to either - I do it through the more = active >>> committers who basically spend all their time merging patches. A few >>> of the initial commiters are not currently active on the project; >>> they've made major contributions over the last few years of >>> development and are committers in recognition of those contributions >>> (see above). >>>=20 >>> Popping up a level. We are happy to have github discussions forward = to >>> either our dev- list or a reviews- list or something like that (I >>> beleive Matei is setting that up now). If IPCM folks want to debate >>> whether we should *have* to do that, it seems sensible to fork a >>> thread and discuss elsewhere. If IPMC folks want to debate whether >>> github should be allowed at all, I also think it's better discussed >>> outside of this graduation thread. >>>=20 >>> = --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >>>=20 >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >>=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org