incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
Date Sun, 16 Feb 2014 00:42:51 GMT
+1 (binding)




On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>wrote:

> I would say that is the right approach, and
> that this vote should continue on.
>
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Joseph,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the clarification.
> >
> > After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that
> those entries were made by Nathan and a Yahoo! employee.
> >
> > (I thought I had added Nathan to the file, but after checking the
> history, realized I didn’t, so there is a commit rollback in the history).
> >
> > I have reached out to both of them with a request to remove those
> entries.
> >
> > I’m assuming we can continue with the vote without having to start over
> at this point?
> >
> > Thanks again for your input.
> >
> > - Taylor
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
> >> added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them.  But
> >> if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
> >> be asked to.
> >>
> >> In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not.  If you fix
> >> this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue.
> >>
> >> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files
> use the Apache v2 license.
> >>>
> >>> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public
> License. In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license
> header already (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with
> the Apache v2 license header.
> >>>
> >>> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?
> >>>
> >>> -Taylor
> >>>
> >>>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi sebb,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
> >>>>
> >>>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
> >>>> file(s) involved.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Taylor
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date
can
> >>>>>> stay as 2013.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the
> license
> >>>>>> provided with the files.
> >>>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to
> downstream
> >>>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is
not
> >>>>>> required.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <suresh@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the
NOTICE
> file. I
> >>>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual
or
> companies
> >>>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block
this
> release
> >>>>>>> and can be addressed later.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for the input!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed
by Nathan
> Marz, and
> >>>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse
Public
> License, but
> >>>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is
not the
> correct thing
> >>>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file.
I'm not
> sure if
> >>>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - Taylor
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating)
> version
> >>>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed
with 9
> +1 votes
> >>>>>>>> (6
> >>>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Release Vote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Release Vote Result:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE
file.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the
above?
> >>>>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
> >>>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE
file?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits
that are actually
> >>>>>>>> included in the distributiion.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be
found here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found
here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available
here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found
here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release
can be
> found here:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm
> 0.9.1-incubating.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
> >>>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Apache Storm Team
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual
or
> entity to
> >>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> >>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If the
> reader
> >>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that
> >>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure
or
> >>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you
> have
> >>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the
sender
> immediately
> >>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message