incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
Date Sat, 15 Feb 2014 19:43:44 GMT
I would say that is the right approach, and
that this vote should continue on.

On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joseph,
> 
> Thank you very much for the clarification.
> 
> After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that those entries were
made by Nathan and a Yahoo! employee.
> 
> (I thought I had added Nathan to the file, but after checking the history, realized I
didn’t, so there is a commit rollback in the history).
> 
> I have reached out to both of them with a request to remove those entries.
> 
> I’m assuming we can continue with the vote without having to start over at this point?
> 
> Thanks again for your input.
> 
> - Taylor
> 
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
>> added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them.  But
>> if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
>> be asked to.
>> 
>> In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not.  If you fix
>> this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue.
>> 
>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use the
Apache v2 license.
>>> 
>>> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public License.
In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license header already (the JavaScript
files mentioned above), were updated with the Apache v2 license header.
>>> 
>>> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> Hi sebb,
>>>>> 
>>>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
>>>> 
>>>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
>>>> file(s) involved.
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Taylor
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
>>>>>> stay as 2013.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
>>>>>> provided with the files.
>>>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
>>>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
>>>>>> required.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <suresh@hortonworks.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE
file. I
>>>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or
companies
>>>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block
this release
>>>>>>> and can be addressed later.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the input!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by
Nathan Marz, and
>>>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public
License, but
>>>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the
correct thing
>>>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm
not sure if
>>>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - Taylor
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating)
version
>>>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed
with 9 +1 votes
>>>>>>>> (6
>>>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Release Vote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44C5BAAD-0FD8-454C-84D7-C8DA924420D7@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Release Vote Result:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3A207F1C-3B07-4029-93D4-87ABEB412D36@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE
file.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>>>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that
are actually
>>>>>>>> included in the distributiion.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found
here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found
here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release
can be found here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Apache Storm Team
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual
or entity to
>>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader
>>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that
>>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure
or
>>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have
>>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
immediately
>>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message