incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)
Date Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:10:50 GMT
Hey Chris,

Okay we'll focus on that distribution path for the 0.9.0 release. Thanks!

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> In fact, Sonatype will let you publish non o.a.xx dependencies since
> they are an approved forge as well for Central sync. So you can sign
> up for an account there, but it's always good to get the buy in of the
> specific community of the upstream dependency so they are aware.
>
> These types of things though can be addressed over time and as each
> release improves.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
> Date: Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:39 PM
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)
>
>>Thanks Marvin and Joe,
>>
>>Do you know which other projects/people we might reach out to for
>>institutional knowledge of how this is done?
>>
>>Our specific issue is that while 99% of our dependencies are in maven,
>>there are a small # of dependencies that don't publish anywhere via
>>maven. One solution would be if apache let us publish these to maven
>>central - but I'm guessing Apache limits us to publishing o.i.a.XXX
>>artifacts.
>>
>>- Patrick
>>
>>On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey
>><marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> We are planning to do our next major release (Spark 0.9.0) while still
>>>> under incubation in the next few weeks. Could I propose that we create
>>>> a parallel discussion about how we might re-tool or build process with
>>>> the aim towards satisfying whatever policy exists in that release?
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> That seems reasonable to me.
>>>
>>> We're winging it a bit, since discussions about under what
>>>circumstances to
>>> relax policy are ongoing (see the "IP Clearance before releasing"
>>>thread).
>>> However, you've taken the initiative to make a constructive proposal.
>>>We
>>> should work with you.
>>>
>>> Marvin Humphrey
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message