incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyunsik Choi <hyun...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating RC1
Date Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:06:40 GMT
Sebb,

Thank you for your earlier check on this vote. We will fix and make a
new candidate for release.

- hyunsik



On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 October 2013 07:40, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> This is the first release candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating,
>> and it is also the first official release for Tajo.
>>
>> The PPMC vote [1][2] was passed with 5 binding +1s and no -1.
>>
>> Release git tag is at:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tajo.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/release-0.2.0-rc1
>
> The NOTICE file is wrong.
>
> ===========
> Apache Tajo
> Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> This product includes software developed by The Apache Software
> Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
> This product includes/uses Jetty (http://jetty.mortbay.org/),
> Copyright (c) Mort Bay Consulting Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
>
> <snip>
> ============
>
> The middle paragraph must read
>
> =====
> This product includes software developed at
> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> =====
>
> Note that it is developed AT not BY.
>
> The third paragraph is also wrong.
> Additional notices are ONLY for included bits, so "/uses" must be removed.
> Also, the NOTICE file must be appropriate to the container, which is
> either SCM (i.e. Git) or the source archive or the binary archive.
> Since the source archive and SCM should rarely contain binary code, it
> generally has different contents from a binary archive that may
> contain permitted 3rd party libraries
> Furthermore, only *required* notices should be included [1]
>
> AFAICT there is only a source archive provided, so there is no need to
> consider binary dependencies.
>
> It looks like the only possible candidate for the NOTICE file is the
> JQuery and JSPlumb javascript source, and as those are both available
> under the MIT license, according to [1] it's not needed.
>
> However of course the LICENSE file must contain the appropriate
> license text for each (or pointers to them in additional files). The
> LICENSE entry should make clear that we are using the MIT license, as
> the other choice (GPL2) is not be allowed in ASF releases.
>
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>
>
>> Release notes is at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~hyunsik/tajo-0.2.0-incubating-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>
>> Release artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha512 are at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~hyunsik/tajo-0.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>
>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can
>> currently be found at:
>> http://people.apache.org/keys/group/tajo.asc
>>
>> The RAT report is at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~hyunsik/tajo-0.2.0-incubating-rc1/rat.txt
>>
>> Please vote
>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-tajo-0.2-incubating
>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hyunsik Choi
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/unaim5aalwjuajr3
>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/ywxozclddlp4avov
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message