Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6EDC10C02 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51675 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 20:12:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51399 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 20:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51387 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2013 20:12:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:12:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:11:59 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id lf11so3330924vcb.35 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:11:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=R3Xl9fUBZeyke/MWBu9ebj1TPyxiUELWN137jl/ZVgI=; b=MdYjz8fKrXYep6eSH/kSuRm09aY+/jTR41ZRPUVi2KDXWRu4Fz0hVjJgJ4mHNcvya9 PeMM53JGSLuMRidZoAYOWaP3nClWjjYFubPLoOAtM7YKq6fB5Eyzqm6m0L50aQEVUTan x++FFcl4hRB74jHURjlfycGkKu6KJFgD2pMbBkJ2AXlMHrv+Pw1EF7loROMwJJ1oWry3 wRiZFOznciHR9ea1Tc+8uGJ84HgTBT33fhA4x5msambKuh0HdYgmw16mzIbbCi6LTf4z TFp23GXTpApebfMBxs0Fsm4m25g3fXJYI2tUvbnnw6O0ywGfOY3ivwM7+OIdY2qTY5I+ jIbA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.235.193 with SMTP id uo1mr28250216vec.6.1379362298990; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.226.165 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.226.165 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1377592103.63465.YahooMailNeo@web28906.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 22:11:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch impl @Apache? From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6ac72d918b104e685cfcc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bd6ac72d918b104e685cfcc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Now Scott informed us we can fork the RI ( http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-jbatch-impl= -Apache-td36529.html) is it ok to start to write a proposal? Le 30 ao=FBt 2013 15:23, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a =E9crit : > Hi > > added some few modules: > * shiro: nothing fancy just a simple SecurityService which check some per= m > to start/restart jobs - mainly to show how to write a custom one > * extras: some readers/writers (flat, StAX) > * beanio: integration with BeanIO framework > > I'll be quite off next week but any feedback + help to go ahead would be > perfect > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/8/27 Romain Manni-Bucau > >> Hi >> >> here is the fork: https://github.com/rmannibucau/batchee >> >> I created a parent module even if not yet mandatory since we will surely >> add a kind of extra module with readers, writers etc... >> >> I put a TODO.md with tasks i see as important to do >> >> mvn clean install will execute TCKs (normally it should be green in java >> 6 or 7) >> >> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau * >> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* >> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> >> >> >> 2013/8/27 Andy Van Den Heuvel >> >>> Great, >>> >>> Keep us posted. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Great to here, >>> > >>> > i plan to create a fork (maybe "copy" is more appropriated here) on m= y >>> > github for the end of this week (hopefully) then we can maybe discuss >>> > around it, does it work for you? >>> > >>> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * >>> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >>> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > 2013/8/27 Mark Struberg >>> > >>> > > I'd definitly need a jBatch here for some customers and I'd be happ= y >>> to >>> > > help with hacking, testing and even mentoring. >>> > > >>> > > LieGrue, >>> > > strub >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > > > From: Alan Cabrera >>> > > > To: general@incubator.apache.org >>> > > > Cc: >>> > > > Sent: Monday, 26 August 2013, 17:15 >>> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch impl @Apache? >>> > > > >>> > > > Is there enough interest to generate an active community for this= ? >>> > > Would it >>> > > > make more sense to do this work under Geronimo or TomEE? >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Regards, >>> > > > Alan >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> rmannibucau@gmail.com >>> > > >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > >> Hi >>> > > >> >>> > > >> As you probably know JavaEE 7 proposes a new spec called JBatch >>> (aka >>> > > JSR >>> > > >> 352). >>> > > >> >>> > > >> I'd love to see an implementation @Apache. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> There is ATM only one implementation (spring-batch doesn't pass >>> the >>> > > > full >>> > > >> TCKs): the RI (done by IBM). >>> > > >> >>> > > >> AFAIK they doesn't aim to create a community about this spec bu= t >>> > their >>> > > >> implementation is under the license Apache v2 and starting to >>> > > implement it >>> > > >> from scratch i started to get something very close to them (i >>> just >>> > > started >>> > > >> but seeing my classes so close i decided to stop my impl from >>> scratch >>> > > and >>> > > >> see if forking wouldn't be a better/easier solution). >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Personally my plan would be to fork their code and clean/update >>> it >>> > and >>> > > >> create a community around it. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> About it i have some questions: >>> > > >> 1) does it sound good? >>> > > >> 2) any interested people? >>> > > >> 3) how to process exactly? >>> > > >> >>> > > >> *Romain Manni-Bucau* >>> > > >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau * >>> > > >> *Blog: >>> > > > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>> > > >>> > > >> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >>> > > >> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.or= g >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> > --047d7bd6ac72d918b104e685cfcc--