incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: The podling initial committers issue
Date Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:24:26 GMT

On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Dave <> wrote:

> Here's what I think we should add:
> After a proposal is submitted to the incubator but before a vote is called
> the proposing community may choose to add additional committers who ask to
> be committers or may chose to defer adding new committers until the podling
> is in the Incubator and can use the normal ways of ASF meritocracy,
> nominate new committers, etc.
> Do people agree with that text?

The "normal ways" stuff needs to be word-smithed. It's an
obvious "slam" against the way 90-95% of how other proposals
have been done and implies that somehow that's "wrong".

If you delete everything after "is in the Incubator..." then
it's a little less biased or leading.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message