incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shreepadma Venugopalan <shreepa...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Sentry for Incubator
Date Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:27:43 GMT
Thanks, David for the pointers.


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:46 PM, David Crossley <crossley@apache.org> wrote:

> Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:
> > Thanks for your feedback, Marvin.
> >
> > We can defer creating the user list for a while.
> >
> > Since Sentry is a security project, we expect security holes to be
> reported
> > and we'd like to keep those discussions on a private list. I understand
> > private@ is meant for private PMC discussions. Since the context and the
> > membership is different, we'd like to keep the security and PMC
> discussions
> > on separate lists.
>
> See:
> http://www.apache.org/security/
>
> There is a useful mention of mail lists at the end of
> http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
>
> -David
>
> > Regards.
> > Shreepadma
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Marvin Humphrey <
> marvin@rectangular.com>wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> > > <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > IMO a more diverse set of mentors affiliations would be better
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I'd also like to ask about the email list configuration.
> > >
> > >     * private@sentry.incubator.apache.org for private PMC discussions
> > > (with
> > >       moderated subscriptions)
> > >     * security@sentry.incubator.apache.org for private security
> related
> > >       discussions
> > >     * dev@sentry.incubator.apache.org
> > >     * commits@sentry.incubator.apache.org
> > >     * user@sentry.incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > > We've started suggesting that user list creation be deferred for a
> while --
> > > see <http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MailingListOptions>.  However,
> in
> > > this
> > > case, it looks like the incoming project is already pretty big, so a
> user
> > > list
> > > may indeed be justified up front.  For what it's worth, I tried to see
> what
> > > kind of traffic was on the existing "Access" list, but it seems that
> signup
> > > was required to view the list archives.
> > >
> > > The other thing I'd like to ask about is the rationale for separating
> out
> > > security@ from private@.  A handful of Apache TLPs have dedicated
> > > security@
> > > lists, and I don't object; I'd just like to hear, because I'd like to
> add a
> > > section on security@ lists to the MailingListOptions page.
> > >
> > > Oh, and naturally the security@ list will need moderated subscriptions
> > > like
> > > the private@ list. ;)
> > >
> > > Marvin Humphrey
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message