Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89C4D1066C for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95902 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2013 20:15:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95665 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2013 20:15:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95657 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2013 20:15:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:15:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.21 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.21] (HELO exprod6og108.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:15:08 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUfgetqAImFkdAtdl3yesDhDErCH6eE04@postini.com; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:14:47 PDT Received: from inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com (mail-321.sea.adobe.com [153.32.1.52]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r6UKEiAI015180 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r6UKEhw7001357 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.99]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:14:43 -0700 From: Alex Harui To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:14:41 -0700 Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman Thread-Index: Ac6NYW2yDZ/Z5lXNS0Ofvyy5MQJJ1Q== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7/30/13 12:50 PM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote: >On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Marvin Humphrey >> wrote: >>> ...Bertrand was skeptical about an ASF-wide ombud, but didn't raise >>>any objection >>> to an Incubator-specific position. >>> http://s.apache.org/NAa >> ... >> >> Just laziness on my part...what I said there also applies to an >> Incubator ombudsman, I'll repeat it here: I don't think we need it - >> people should feel >> free to contact people that they trust (IPMC members, mentors, ASF >> members) privately if there's a need, and not having someone elected >> in the ombudsman role means people are free to talk to whoever *they* >> think will help. > >+1 to what Bertrand said. +1 from me too. However... >If podlings don't know where to go we need to tell them they can ping >people >they trust in private AND they always can speak about problems in public >on general@. Discussing things in public is what we always (should) do. ...as a newbie in Apache and a member of a recently graduated podling, I have to say that if our mentors had completely failed us so I couldn't go to them in private, I wouldn't know who else to ping in private because I didn't know anybody else in Apache. However, just about any issues I can think of would be able to be at least introduced on general@ without naming names and maybe some volunteer watching general@ would offer to help in private. > >That said, if you would like to start that experiment I don't object, >but I don't expect anything from it. Same here, and I don't have a binding vote anyway. But I would prefer an experiment where instead of hiding behind a title like Ombud, (and if you must have a title, I like "Community Advocate" better), that the experiment just be that one or two people introduce themselves to each podling offering to be the sounding board and advocate if their mentors and shepherds get too busy. Even now, as a new TLP with few experienced Apache folks on it, it would be good to know who in Apache is willing to help out if we get stuck. I figure everyone is busy enough as it is and that it has to be a big deal before asking on board@. I guess members@ is a possibility, but if someone like JimJag "visited" our dev list and volunteered to help out new TLPs as well that would make Apache appear all that more friendly and welcoming. -Alex > >Cheers >Christian > >> -Bertrand >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> > > > >--=20 >http://www.grobmeier.de >https://www.timeandbill.de > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org