incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wave 0.4 based on RC3
Date Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:14:52 GMT
Joe,

Thanks for your comments. Can you clarify for us the PPMC comment. I think we are a bit confused
between the concepts of a top level project PMC, the incubator IPMC, the PPMC you have mentioned,
and piddling mentors. I don't think we had ever discussed nominating a PPMC assuming that
first p stands for podling. 

I think we were under the inkers soon that the mentors were the management committe for the
podling. Is there a good document on this somewhere?

~Michael

On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@zonker.net> wrote:

> I should have added: please do address the problems here and re-roll and
> I will be sure to examine that release in a timely fashion. Don't let a
> -1 discourage you, as most incubating projects have to go through a
> learning curve. 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 06:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> Hi Ali, 
>> 
>> Comments inline. 
>> 
>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>> 
>>> The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at:
>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVfPOwN3E8N-uScruYbxdezpfZzAJHMp8dN%2BUfpF6s%2BDGw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> 
>> I find this slightly confusing as I expected at least 3 PPMC votes, but
>> I guess Wave has opted for the committer == PPMC model? 
>> 
>>> Wave 0.4 RC3 artefacts are available at:
>>> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc3/
>>> Note: The checksums are SHA-512's
>> 
>> A couple of things:
>> 
>> - Preferably, you'd only include *one* set of artifacts to vote on. Am I
>> voting on the zip, the bz2? I'm uncomfortable voting without checking
>> out all the source releases as I have no way of knowing that the zip ==
>> the bz2 release without inspecting both.
>> 
>> - Preferably, there'd be no binary release in the artifacts you're
>> asking to have voted on. Convenience binaries are fine, but they're not
>> an official release, so it'd be better not to include them with the
>> files we're meant to be voting on. 
>> 
>> - I have to -1 this as there are several binary (.jar) files included in
>> the release that don't belong in a source release. (under
>> third_party/codegen/*) 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> jzb
>> -- 
>> Joe Brockmeier
>> jzb@zonker.net
>> Twitter: @jzb
>> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> jzb
> -- 
> Joe Brockmeier
> jzb@zonker.net
> Twitter: @jzb
> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message