incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com>
Subject Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?
Date Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:18:07 GMT
+1

Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 15 Jun 2013 16:04, "Alan Cabrera" <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > I think there's merit in the idea of multiple, smaller incubators, so
> > long as it is set up in a way that doesn't involve prospective podlings
> > playing the incubators against each other.
>
> Can you provide detail on what you mean by "prospective podlings playing
> the incubators against each other"?  I'm not sure what that means.
>
> > Smaller groups, with smaller membership, gives the chance of a greater
> > sense of ownership and identification, which are important to community
> > building.
>
> Is that really our problem?  Who needs this greater sense of ownership and
> identification?
>
> In short, I'd like proponents of this thread to explain in concrete detail:
> What is the problem to be solved?
> What is the base cause of that problem?
> How does splitting the Incubator in to sub-groups of technology solves the
> cause of this problem?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message