Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B10D811FAC for ; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94848 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2013 19:40:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94444 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2013 19:40:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94436 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2013 19:40:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:40:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.105] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 May 2013 19:40:25 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (ap-ehub-sp01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.148]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r4BJe0Sj003282 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits) verified NO) for ; Sat, 11 May 2013 12:40:00 -0700 Received: from AP-EMBX-SP40.RES.AD.JPL ([169.254.7.50]) by ap-ehub-sp01.RES.AD.JPL ([169.254.3.100]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Sat, 11 May 2013 12:40:02 -0700 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC Thread-Topic: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC Thread-Index: AQHOSf0KZIYzXl7iOESEvGhmVFvKgZj5i94AgADCMQD//5ScKoABQ/6AgABMBoCAAAkZgIABdOmAgAIml4CAAAIvAIAA7JCAgABkswCAAB2qgIAAAgiAgAArkwCAABUCAP//bWAA Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 19:40:01 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416 x-originating-ip: [128.149.137.113] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <13AA04DAA432A141BFD9363FC75F9818@ad.jpl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Schaefer Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Date: Saturday, May 11, 2013 8:24 AM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC >I firmly believe our priority in mentoring podlings is to instill >self-governance as early as is feasible, and the proven way to accomplish >that task is to identify suitable members of the podling and elect them >to the IPMC so they are fully empowered to do it. Every other approach >is suboptimal. And I fully agree with Joe, it's just that I don't think we that the IPMC is the body to elect them too -- elect them to the incoming podling/probationary TLP's own committee, which contains ASF members (at least 3) to watch them, and make them report out as normal projects do. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >On May 11, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > >>=20 >> On May 11, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Joseph Schaefer >>wrote: >>=20 >>> Frankly I find the notion that the board will do a better job of >>>MENTORING >>> these projects than the IPMC to be batshit insane, but that's just me. >>> We need manpower, and there is plenty of that available amongst the >>>competent >>> volunteers who actively participate in these projects. Let's just do >>> what's easiest for once and promote these folks to the IPMC in order >>> to get the job done right. It's a proven model that we need to stop >>> fighting. >>=20 >>=20 >> Yes, shuttling the kids off the the grandparents is not going to solve >>anything. If individuals on the board have the bandwidth to help they >>should come over here. There's nothing specific about the auspices of >>the board that would improve the situation. >>=20 >> I personally think that we have "almost" enough people to mentor. I >>think that the burnout comes from our constant churning of policy and >>lack of tooling to make mundane tasks easier. >>=20 >> For example, maybe >> better reminders for reports >> automatic nudging of mentors who have not signed reports >> dead pilot buttons to detect inactive mentors (Is it called a dead >>pilot button) >> maybe a standard to podling releases to make vetting easier - i.e. >>apply tooling >> changes/additions to vetting procedures taking place outside of release >>votes. (ok not a tooling issue) >>=20 >>=20 >> Regards, >> Alan >>=20 > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org