incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Date Mon, 13 May 2013 22:56:49 GMT
Hi all,

the current tally, right now, is:

+1 binding from Ant Elder (IPMC)
+1 binding from Siegfried Goeschl (Mentor)
+5 non binding from PPMC

(all votes casted on jspwiki-dev@i.a.o) We still need one more +1 binding
vote to be able to release, so we'd be most grateful if someone could take
a look at it.

thx in advance!


br,
juan pablo

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ant,
>
> thanks for the vote :-)
>
> Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4
> entries, being the reasons behind each one:
> - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in
> NOTICE
>
> - "Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation." entry: legal's
> advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE
>
> - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5
> License, which in section 4.b states "If you distribute, publicly display,
> publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative
> Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...]"
>
> - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed
> in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative
> work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL "You may add Your own
> attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
> or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such
> additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the
> License."
>
> Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are
> there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a
> handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in
> NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific
> dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects
> using it)
>
> Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it.
> It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to
> start graduation discuss soon thereafter.
>
> @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at
> jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote
>
>
> br,
> juan pablo
>
> [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs
> [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution
> [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release.
>>
>> I give it a +1.
>>
>> There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation
>> DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the
>> source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these
>> missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time,
>> or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next
>> time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't
>> needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README.
>> Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think
>> that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the
>> next release.
>>
>>    ...ant
>>
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
>> <juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki
>> > 2.9.1-incubating [#1].
>> >
>> > The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on
>> the
>> > developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3
>> non-binding
>> > votes (from jspwiki developers).
>> >
>> > I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release
>> > candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira
>> Issue
>> > Tracker [#2].
>> >
>> > Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on
>> the
>> > vote.
>> >
>> > thanks in advance,
>> > juan pablo
>> >
>> >
>> > [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD
>> > [#2]
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12321249
>> > ===================================================
>> >
>> > Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed
>> > artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only.
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted upon:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2
>> >
>> > Source and binary files, with RAT report:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/
>> >
>> > Checksums:
>> >
>> > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip
>> > MD5:    58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d
>> > SHA1:   5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b
>> > SHA512:
>> >
>> 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18
>> >
>> > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip
>> > MD5:    707b52ce9ca32fe012bcc3b1a79d8f96
>> > SHA1:   41619359a04d49a2f5b58b8ba1a5d0c186fbbb1c
>> > SHA512:
>> >
>> 2c4f6e0b9e163d2b3ae60a091993598ed6e315a7f7b4c08a9232cbd0c1eccba4259818e0e9ab8a86350a0109924be21cc0627e8a549bbd52b14ca7b40dcccee0
>> >
>> > JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating
>> > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message