Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA614FA47 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68894 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 13:54:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68691 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 13:54:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68673 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2013 13:54:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:54:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ant.elder@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.54] (HELO mail-oa0-f54.google.com) (209.85.219.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:54:36 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n12so2735810oag.41 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:54:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KZ5QXKgSDPS3wmHX8TRR0ldXlSzmTQxuJZs7NWySMUk=; b=sIkJn1Zyz2Pa0u1KIvYlkBs7poBstGy4PwGvSwHobZ87bBdQy1sI9lbu2DG1oFL5tk EvRHnKJDPF+gAlnbpUl2VoKmmMqF9uUirKuUhO90dUtGHK64Sj7ggzjfORT2R3I4FKai hpPpX2oNUqPn4O3oOXOLn//hMPrHQLy1hd2Ys1KyFATcu6utOFIw+4xkrAU3tenlnKpY NULy33as2zy1wjZA8kfl0SpQGo85G6XFUcvjU2pi30U/5VEQa5NtD+qa37ls9OCuDJ1R iVNlwhPYJr7Ku5BvFJ2r0OWiZ6nRFXKgrJy8vVrfO0JZc3I95P7y0bm9UZdRe5rSwXCd qaGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.63.238 with SMTP id j14mr1914265oes.52.1365083655491; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.77.40 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 06:54:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1364894259.8780.140661212229689.11FB5FA5@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5751730F-2B19-41EF-9F48-68048EE6CAB0@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 14:54:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus) From: ant elder To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c21a8c5fd9dc04d9894e44 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c21a8c5fd9dc04d9894e44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Having said that, here's an idea that builds on your proposal. There is > already the opportunity to name the board as the sponsoring organisation. > Why not say "where the board is willing to sponsor the project it can go > straight to TLP" (e.g. exactly as Apache Steve did). This would allow a > larger scale experiment around Chris' proposal but provides the opportunity > for the board to control how much of the oversight role is pushed towards > it and how much remains with the IPMC. > > Ross > If the board are ok with that experiment then i think it sounds like an fine thing to try. ...ant --001a11c21a8c5fd9dc04d9894e44--