Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95D86F1C7 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53444 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2013 08:47:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52849 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2013 08:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52826 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2013 08:47:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:47:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.17.9] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.17.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:47:39 +0000 Received: from mafr.de (HSI-KBW-046-005-143-209.hsi8.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [46.5.143.209]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LZl8O-1V4lx34Bq8-00lpsl; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:47:18 +0100 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:47:16 +0100 From: Matthias Friedrich To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus Message-ID: <20130329084714.GA13072@mafr.de> Mail-Followup-To: general@incubator.apache.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:41oxrcEqxSdiijgzLvXH65ZbK14Q9q8cQDuRRuxMj/6 v0iuqcCEKvYCQs/52zsuubZxdL4DXJpp5VgKauYuMUOyv4jrra UImTghGSV7/quKrjoNgMhk+scZA+NZy2WCx2Ni+ZQKA4GFVflZ UU8pW9MRmyuUga2YS7Gh1ycAikSfzbl+KJakg4QPQDeqmMrnpG bxZ9wMZgm6dv85fzBf8ZC1TFokITfRPtfeOh0fwbvEcITartKf yMvHeKhXCYIFVEdsIJqqYiFDjP1rx6SZ/ksQIQivb1GIQSIenQ 1x6oPgf3u0E3Dw1N12RfTJaP3Ue5zcXgSTL0YlOqWkyfsQLxA= = X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thursday, 2013-03-28, Chris Douglas wrote: [...] > Is this a question of standing, where material harm needs to be demonstrated? > The IPMC is needlessly inefficient and abusive of its podlings. Novel > "compliance" mechanisms are literally invented and argued about on > general@ during podlings' release votes.[1] The cultural clashes that > Chris's proposal refers to generate huge amounts of traffic on > general@ and private@, as ASF members argue the semantics of core > concepts. And it's not just edge-case legal issues; some are as basic > as the definition of "veto". > These discussions create needless confusion and deeply resented churn > for podlings. The asymmetry in power teaches submissiveness to ASF > members, rather than independence and self-sufficiency. There are, in > truth, *many* active interpretations of the Apache Way practiced > across the ASF. Reconciling them is not the mission of the incubator. > Putting esoteric debates on the critical path of new projects is > absurd and harmful. > [1] http://s.apache.org/lFI As someone who is relatively new to the ASF and who's first behind the scenes contact with Apache was the incubation process, I can tell that this is absolutely true. Podlings find themselves in a kafkaesque world where many rules are undocumented or can only be found in old mailing list discussions. Apache and this list especially can feel like a really hostile place for newbies. Regards, Matthias --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org