Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79BD7EB42 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66472 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2013 01:37:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66301 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2013 01:37:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66293 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2013 01:37:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:37:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.85.173.253] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (64.85.173.253) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:37:10 +0000 Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 0A2041814A5; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:36:48 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on server.dankulp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter-general@incubator.apache.org.CXRYEtHVXS Received: from [10.187.58.40] (unknown [173.240.244.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07C601809D6 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:36:46 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator) From: Daniel Kulp In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:36:42 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <60F7DA9E-8507-4577-8182-EB42D88095E5@apache.org> References: To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:21 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" = wrote: > Hi Dave, >=20 > On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: >=20 >>>=20 >>> This is exactly the scenario I have in mind. Most of the times, >>> projects aim for being very successful and have their own healthy >>> community, but that is not always the outcome, and exiting Incubator >>> as an adopted project should be still be a possibility. >>=20 >> I don't think we should exclude incubating projects from being >> incorporated into other projects. It may be preferred to the attic or >> github should a community fail to thrive. The incubator does not need = to >> be TLP or fail. >>=20 >> Perhaps the assimilation of an incubating podling to another PMC = should >> not be called graduation. Maybe it should be handled piece by piece. >>=20 >> (1) PPMC votes to approach a PMC with Mentor / IPMC approval like for = a >> release. >=20 > Please name me a specific example scenario in which #1 has happened at = the > ASF without pre stated intent to join that TLP. I'm going to date myself an make myself feel old, but: Yoko Originally, Yoko was planning to be a TLP. However, the entire CORBA = space kind of died and the original company involved with donating the = code more or less withdrew support. However, by then Geronimo had taken = it as an important dependency and a few of the Geronimo folks had = started contributing fixes and stuff to it. Some CXF users were using = the web service parts of it. However, the community itself really = couldn't get enough traction. (partially because it was a split = community between the ORB folks and the WS folks). Thus, instead of = graduating to TLP, it kind of split with the ORB going to Geromino and = the WS bits being assimilated into CXF's main build. =20 So, it the community didn't completely die. Incubation wasn't really a = failure. The incubation efforts really showed that it should have been = parts of the existing TLPs. Dan > I would be very surprised to see it happen b/c it would imply = graduation > into an existing TLP wasn't premeditated. > That's the whole point of the "sponsoring PMC" portion of the = Incubator > proposal, from the beginning, to declare > the intent to graduate into a existing TLP - otherwise that section > wouldn't be needed and the answer would always > be Incubator PMC. For the record, since the whole umbrella project = thing, > most of the sponsoring (I can name perhaps 1-5) > incoming Incubator podlings are all Incubator PMC sponsored, for = intent to > graduate to TLP. >=20 > On the graduating into existing TLP end, I don't think that makes = sense - > apparently at least 2 other people don't either judging by +1s and = words. > I would like to fix that. But, I don't think I've ever seen #1 where = they > haven't already declared that their intent from the beginning. >=20 >>=20 >> (2) Receiving PMC votes to accept IP - if not cleared then it accepts >> that responsibility. >=20 > If PMCs can accept the type of "podling sized" IP contribution then I > think that the Incubator is a pointless committee. >=20 > Cheers, > Chris >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 --=20 Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org