incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Incubator voting status page
Date Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:23:29 GMT
On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko ─îibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:
> On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
>>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
>>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
>>> podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
>>> need to get podling developers interested with.
>>>
>> I have a current example.  Flex and Wink haven't updated their
>> podlings.xml entries to
>>     status="graduated"
>> , therefore certain infra scripts still consider them podlings rather
>> than PMCs.
>
> Nor had PhotArk updated its entry to "retired" until I did that
> yesterday to get rid of one of the warnings.
>
> I'm not actually all that worried. The worst that can happen in the case
> of the voter script is that some votes don't get recorded, or are
> recorded later than expected. The script does emit warnings if it sees
> strangeness; I /could/ teach it to send the warnings to the podling's
> dev list (if known), cc: general@. But I'd rather not open the spam
> floodgates unless people really want me to.

Why not append the errors to the end of the report?
Or create a separate page containing just the errors and link to if
from the main page?

> -- Brane
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message