incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Date Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:37:11 GMT
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.franklin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, January 21, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
>>> sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks can learn to use ivy,
>>> maven, or maven-ant-tasks to reduce the need for this, but I'd like to
>>> be clear on whether this is required behavior or not. I thought that a
>>> source package could incorporate binaries of at least 'A'
>>> dependencies, but I am happy to be corrected. And svn is yet another
>>> question.
>>
>> I am referring to this discussion  http://s.apache.org/MUZ
> Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
> founders yell at us but we have no mechanism to channel those yells
> into concise, unambiguous, documentation.

Per haps off-topic ... but I fail to see how "source release" is
ambiguous or not concise.

Unless the Java world has a different definition of "source code" than
us stuck-in-the-mud plodders, and it's only considered binary once it's
been JIT-compiled. :)

-- Brane


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message