incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Martin <gary.mar...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating)
Date Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:59:15 GMT
Hi,

It seems that we need just one more IPMC vote in order to release Apache 
Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating). Sebb has not yet indicated whether he is 
happy with Brane's response but would anyone else like to look and 
perhaps give us a final vote?

Cheers,
     Gary

On 18/01/13 11:03, Branko ─îibej wrote:
> On 18.01.2013 11:39, sebb wrote:
>> On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos <ryan.ollos@wandisco.com> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
>>> (incubating)
>>> in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
>>>
>>> The vote PPMC vote thread:
>>>      http://markmail.org/message/d2yvz2tx5pj57ru4
>>>
>>> Please find the change log for this proposed release below:
>>>
>>>   * Replaces ticket edit form with a new 'in-place' edit and workflow control
>>>   * Added white-labeling for error messages and basic branding
>>>   * Improvements to the quick ticket creation form including ability to
>>> specify the select fields and their order
>>>   * Various bug fixes
>>>
>>>   * Not fixed for this release:
>>>     * No major outstanding issues
>>>
>>> The release candidate artifacts consist of source release as a tar.gz
>>> archive along with the associated MD5 and GPG signature.
>>> These can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>>>
>>> The archive is based on the tag:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bloodhound/tags/0.4-incubating
>> The LICENSE file looks good.
>>
>> However I'm not sure that the NOTICE file is correct.
>>
>> Are all the entries in NOTICE required?
> Bloodhound builds upon Trac and uses Bootstrap and JQuery -- and
> includes all of them in the source release, so yes, I believe all the
> entries are required.
>
>> If they are required, are they correct, i.e. is the correct
>> attribution included?
> As far as I can see, it's all correct. Which one(s) do you find incomplete?
>
> (FWIW, neither the NOTICE file nor the used external modules have
> changed since the previous release.)
>
> -- Brane
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message