Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68073E4D8 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 04:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79544 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2012 04:29:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79249 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2012 04:29:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79168 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2012 04:29:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 04:29:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eric818@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 04:29:40 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id fy7so349908vcb.6 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:29:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=D+qxA/KNQ1xYdtkLVd3HbAfm4IUzSgyzlswUgqTjWdg=; b=Wto3M142sztZ3VXS2ccevd6eomdRCb8bG1Y5cMPqaBiLVSmq20RxrOxwLOedeC8F9j jQbyaEs9rh2zXm/Pj74nru4iBOIdCPziEZgSYBZdRjqTyFoN0WAM6yf5t0cKenRrw77N 1sKeOZegDxdxLF9Tn7bRwotN70cKWByzxgfjsi3kkhSAf84wX5DB34ZDGCaMB1CLjwA5 1OR1FJ24e1X31sfxAd5G+bYCcGOpuid9rGkxOR811Mlpfz9Uq0HJLlhGgWT4o+4CH5L1 VBrQt59M3DRLAWiBql0+ALsSdDWQ8IOvxD1y9CYkAmqxARPa/VK9QUzADZUPX3lSJlk3 hXsg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.162.130 with SMTP id ya2mr3075519veb.2.1354336159423; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:29:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.18.166 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:29:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0A28BB67-A452-4155-AC19-4CF41352A898@toolazydogs.com> <86D4895F-EFA6-43C5-8CCB-E5F78A055918@toolazydogs.com> <69C06816-7AA6-436D-83FF-33271E9FD166@toolazydogs.com> <50B7D786.9020705@apache.org> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:29:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Retirement decision making From: Eric Yang To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6766dcb05d9304cfc2f5c6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b6766dcb05d9304cfc2f5c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 on active PMC duties would be fine to ensure continuation of the project. regards, Eric On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 30 November 2012 00:52, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > Hard cases make bad law. The rough parameters of the recent 'small > > graduates' was that they had around 5 initial PMC members, and some > > detectable evidence that all of them were in the reasonably regular > > habit of contributing code, let alone voting for releases. If we > > insist on testing the absolute lower limit of viability, we're may > > bump into the absurd. > > > > +1 (where "reasonably regular habit of contributing code" should be > "reasonably regular habit of contributing in some way" - that is only being > active in PMC duties would be fine, need not be active committer, as long > as it is responsible activity (i.e. voting from an informed position) > > Ross > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 29/11/12 14:53, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > >> > > >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Alan Cabrera > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> ... Would you also add the three or more active PMC members > > requirement? > > >>> What constitutes active?... > > >> > > >> > > >> IMO the bare minimum is being able to find three PMC members to vote > > >> on things when needed. > > >> > > >> Once a project gets below this limit it's in trouble and usually > > >> headed for the attic, but that's not the only possibility - see > > >> "Resolution to reboot the Apache Xalan PMC" at > > >> > > >> > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2011/board_minutes_2011_07_20.txt > > >> for example. > > > > > > > > > I think we need to be a bit careful about graduating a podling that is > a > > > minimum viable project. That's not say it shouldn't be done but if > it's > > > minimal, and looks ropey, then we're aren't doing us or them any > favours > > if > > > the project looks likely to get into problems quite soon. After all, > > > graduation itself requires project resource. > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > >> > > >> -Bertrand > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com > --047d7b6766dcb05d9304cfc2f5c6--