incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com>
Subject Re: Invoke silent consensus rule for podling releases (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.3 (incubating))
Date Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:44:26 GMT
Sorry, seems it was Luciano I agreed with.

Sent from my tablet
On Dec 1, 2012 8:43 AM, "Ross Gardler" <rgardler@opendirective.com> wrote:

> I'm with Benson here. But we do need to acknowledge the problem identified
> (again) by Branko.
>
> This is a mentoring problem not an IPMC problem. The IPMC needs to solve
> it for existing podlings, and podlings where mentors have gone quiet but we
> need to express higher expectations of mentors for new podlings.
>
> Branko, talk to your mentors. If that fails talk to the IPMC.
>
> Sent from my tablet
> On Dec 1, 2012 7:36 AM, "Luciano Resende" <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko ─îibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
>> > about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
>> > tarball from a podling.
>> >
>> > Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release
>> > every couple weeks; yet the 0.2 vote thread sat in general@ for longer
>> > than that.
>> >
>> > It's worse for these mails to go unanswered than if the release had been
>> > vetoed. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling
>> > release votes.
>> >
>> > -- Brane
>> >
>> >
>> -1 for  extending the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. BTW,
>> have you got any IPMC binding votes from your mentors ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message