incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject Re: More and better report nagging
Date Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:55:15 GMT
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > Personally, I'm not against nagging. Actually, when I'm on the receiving
> > end, I usually appreciate it, as timeliness is not a quality I am widely
> > praised for.
> >
> > Some podlings are in a position that is different from TLPs - they are
> > new to the whole thing, and may therefore require a little more help
> > than we would expect a TLP to need in remembering their
> > responsibilities. However, if I were needing to nag a podling that is
> > otherwise near graduation, I'd perhaps be worried.
> >
> > The DNR marker is still important though, and we should be sure that we
> > don't 'over-nag'. We encourage (more earlier in the process of
> > incubation, less later) and if after a few nags they don't do it, then
> > DNR is just fine.
> 
> 
> I want, at least, a *quick* way to find out how many DNR's are
> pending, and be able to make informed decisions about nagging. So I
> plan to go ahead with the template that allows a tool to tell who is
> missing.

Seems reasonable to me. 

Upayavira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message