Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ant.elder@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALhtWkce3xCYhHckMRVsHyJau-kyd1+zNWw7811JGm2Zmhb8kg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DF9807CF-3980-4D86-A112-8B4CA9272BED@toolazydogs.com>
	<2E45169E9A237B4DA78078A68962F9EF06C71266@IMCMBX01.MITRE.ORG>
	<CALhtWkciaLZGyLXD=hj-7tH4Ynefk-yPwnenxR6HV_MMW6wJgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJmFyJBm+8Cnv4mcoPkvsVsWH6qTsF8=S0muNKPefhGD9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALhtWkckFgaqvqCQjKWSU3x+QbEGBSgTCU9SUuGXtMSLqvTw5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJO+Ubs81S5kOr4_nt4d_Wd3xxVb1Tf=YP7gtjXk+Y7rt3gk1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFk14gs2goMNuHpXKTPcoMxCnfBH+gjaFMo3k2rCnEDeT05-jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALhtWkce3xCYhHckMRVsHyJau-kyd1+zNWw7811JGm2Zmhb8kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:55:06 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAJO+UbtQ3gK8EL_m_cn0Mp_YgUodVjzLRCo7sSD7VmXf5Yz8Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire Chukwa from incubation
From: ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54fae3a8e8af404cf78b85f

--bcaec54fae3a8e8af404cf78b85f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>wrote:

> One interesting point about consensus decision-making process is the
> need to define the starting point. The process assumes that there is a
> clear 'status quo', and that a consensus is required to change it.
> This may not always be the appropriate way to think about retiring a
> podling, but it's clearly the way we're thinking about this one.
>
> Does anyone else feel that this could have benefitted from a [DISCUSS]
> before the [VOTE].
>
> At the bottom line, if there are new mentors to be fully responsible,
> I think it's reasonable to continue; however, I don't want to have
> exactly the same conversation in N months. Would the new mentors like
> to propose a time limit, and is the group willing to subscribe to the
> notion that, if after that time, the new mentors have the same report
> as the old mentors, we're at the end?
>
>
Could we maybe include a time limit next month with the credible plan to
give new mentors a little time to get up to speed with the project?

   ...ant

--bcaec54fae3a8e8af404cf78b85f--