Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexei.fedotov@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOGo0VZfuuTbychSGn7xxgAcweapDFSEh8Ri0DeSGRSjcU1VTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACK5iZfimiOmdFLM9aiD2H-ng6ia2BYfA58Kns6t=L8GygoN_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOGo0VZfuuTbychSGn7xxgAcweapDFSEh8Ri0DeSGRSjcU1VTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:36:47 +0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAGc_3jFa_mGsoHv6xBjcSj_A9OTF6PTQRYJZDaoJZBn_fEz=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello OmPrakash,

I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:

1. The second entry for Apache license.
2. Something like BSD license.

The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.

So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source relea=
se?

--
With best regards / =D1=81 =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=83=D1=87=D1=88=D0=B8=
=D0=BC=D0=B8 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BB=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F=D0=BC=
=D0=B8,
Alexei Fedotov / =D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A4=D0=B5=D0=
=B4=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=BE=D0=B2,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the =
Apache
>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>
>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its dependencie=
s.
>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>
>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>
>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>    - SwfObject
>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>
>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>
>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>
>>
>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.  =
The
>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the voting
>> thread:
>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>
>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>
>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>> available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>
>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source k=
it
>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available here:
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>
>> Here is the tag for the release:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-fl=
ex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>
> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
> under just one of them.
>
> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is good=
.
>
> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
> in the source archive - is that intentional?
> If so, why is it in the tag?
>
> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
> public PGP key servers.
>
> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
> in the source archive.
> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>
>>
>>
>> Please vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Regards,
>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org