Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 310AFE004 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 03:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88137 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2012 03:33:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87775 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2012 03:33:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87741 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2012 03:33:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 03:33:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eric818@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 03:33:33 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m8so6705064vcd.6 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:33:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fo+zCUqvmx28lyq6gSFuLKs2OEl8OsVFOGD5lYOrVd4=; b=VNGAMtU1zeCKGttYzQKicdGe7Q8p6J3ESupyfQZI2jeBe0ihsvxhHEB8/Ua65cqwgq SsM16FWbGJOicw2lu7ieiC4bNRNw9u12cCYPJ/SkwNN44iaiA12V+kpFV16iqC8F8jgW /NVOr1C3OlcWr00JXXJR2hjiynCkA4OOAMMvklyF6c1he8roGBHDwFBxw1ouNQhOKLdm T5R0H9O9YrLPwEDHcLXNAEa//2l18cX1oPK4xpqi44nWKfoLFjlklLD+XnHiAVNQV2sS VAb82IO38IEgowpPI0Wq/1PeHHfw2aB1hk76g3aweWHQHa1gXx4xlVRax0jAPUjp76yx m0vA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.150.82 with SMTP id x18mr17181192vcv.73.1353900792528; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:33:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.18.166 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:33:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:33:12 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: What constitute a successful project? From: Eric Yang To: chukwa-dev@incubator.apache.org, Incubator Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7c1eccbf8d04cf5d9784 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043c7c1eccbf8d04cf5d9784 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi IPMC, For the past two years, Chukwa has been labelled as non-active project by mentors, and has been put on votes for retiring this project by mentor and IPMC. In this year's stats, Chukwa has more activities in comparison to Apache Wink in both mailing list traffic and resolved jiras. Yet Chukwa has been voted to discontinue by mentors, but Wink is voted to graduate by the same mentor. Here are the number of mails showed up in dev list between Apache Chukwa and Apache Wink: Chukka Nov 2012 46 Oct 2012 14 Sep 2012 51 Aug 2012 64 Jul 2012 82 Jun 2012 15 May 2012 24 Apr 2012 18 Mar 2012 71 Feb 2012 11 Jan 2012 60 Wink Nov 2012 18 Oct 2012 14 Sep 2012 2 Aug 2012 69 Jul 2012 5 May 2012 26 Apr 2012 24 Mar 2012 15 Feb 2012 21 Jan 2012 22 And Incubation status shows: ChukwaIncubator2010-07-14865Falsegroup-1TrueTrue 2012-09-10760,2,413 4True True True True True True True True WinkIncubator2009-05-271278Falsegroup-2TrueTrue 2012-08-161010,4,616 3True True True True True True True True In both cases, the metrics shows similar activities for both projects. The number of issues resolved or committed by Chukwa also exceeded Apache Wink in the past 30 days. With respect to the voting result, but it leaves me puzzled that why should Chukwa be retired. When there are contributors, and there are activities for growth. regards, Eric --f46d043c7c1eccbf8d04cf5d9784--