Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of a.broekhuis@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+ULb+sGGRL=FJ6wJ3177oXpBessg0ug5x06FKpEkigBD2k_9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+ULb+vved-wH=4=DKmhvWSvte5FGFSn1etgo5rMxQm8+7Obgw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS6=7iNhV7pLGR5Nq-aPswEeb+LFY_yrj5Vdw3mctJyzaWLfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0VY=V7+kef2dU1fZqPqB1Oze8qZ8H29GWL=j4Q9bYPxAYw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+ULb+v0oz1H=-1kx+8RhTszfazax1HFtJgUKe97hY_SguW7og@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0Vay7hRrOq+SsBkcofeK15b7ZpgsTnv7BSaYhUKBTEMe4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+ULb+ucARWjyHk-HGcJPAeQkJuxnnnghfk2LKkRQ-AFwZ0ZtQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+T-u8eQM5wJ4ymmpOuZt7WGROGukyRiaL4cvr7gYbeFdmQdfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+ULb+sGGRL=FJ6wJ3177oXpBessg0ug5x06FKpEkigBD2k_9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:32:10 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CA+T-u8deX_3b3Pb1mOUFu=0vG9S4UwScbeqRfBpgtpsS7aJK3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums
From: Alexander Broekhuis <a.broekhuis@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c1d32ca317604cfb165e9

--0015174c1d32ca317604cfb165e9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,


> I think that would be a fine choice. I'm fine with releasing it as is for
> now
> +1 (binding).
>

Thanks! Could you post your vote to the formal release thread as well?

>
> That said -- I'd like to see the next release take into account the
> feedback
> that has been provided to the project so far. Nothing there is blocking,
> but not taking it into account would, in my opinion, make it more difficult
> to review and thus diminish the chances of getting enough eyeballs to
> look at it in time.
>

Agreed. Most of the issues are already fixed in trunk.


-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Alexander Broekhuis

--0015174c1d32ca317604cfb165e9--