We vote in one of these people fairly regularly, and we've never rejected
one yet as far as I recall. So I think that this solution has proved
acceptable; the question is, how many of the podlings with a mentor
shortage have a suitable candidate in them? I intend to find out.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > However, the
> > problem here isn't identifying inactive mentors (as seen earlier, we
> > already have everything we need for that) but rather how to replace
> > them. So far, apart from the shepherd model, we haven't seen too many
> > ideas on how to solve or at least partially address that problem.
>
> Recognizing merit and promoting from within the podling has a 100%
> success rate.
>
> * Thift
> * ESME
> * Lucy
> * ManifoldCF
>
> Our problem is not that we don't have a solution, it's that the IPMC
> has not yet come to terms with the solution.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
|