incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joachim Dreimann <joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com>
Subject Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)
Date Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:06:19 GMT
Matt and others:

Do you feel our efforts to remove minified files from future releases are
sufficient for you to cast a vote confidently on this release?

Ticket #255 [1] has removed all minified files from Bloodhound code and our
docs area, the only remaining ones are in our copy to Trac and are being
dealt with as a blocker for the next release in #256 [2].

Cheers,
Joe

[1] https://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound/ticket/255<https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/255>
[2] https://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound/ticket/256<https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/256>

[Resent to incude general@incubator]

On 13 November 2012 09:57, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:

> Thanks for that Joe. I closed #255 on the basis of that work and I have
> raised another that can be used to complete any work for our copy of Trac
> that turns out to be required: https://issues.apache.org/**
> bloodhound/ticket/256 <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/256>
>
> Obviously if we determine here that there is nothing to do then #256
> should be closed with a link to the relevant decisions. I have set it as a
> blocker for release 3 as we need to get this sorted quickly.
>
> Cheers,
>     Gary
>
>
>
> On 12/11/12 18:32, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
>
>> Gary has raised ticket #255 to remove all minified files before the next
>> release:
>> https://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound/ticket/255<https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/255>
>>
>> With my last commit (r1408385) we have now removed all .min. files from
>> bloodhound code and our docs.
>>
>> The only remaining minified files in our repository are now part of the
>> Trac code.
>>
>> - Joe
>>
>>
>> On 12 November 2012 17:38, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>  On 12/11/12 13:19, Branko ─îibej wrote:
>>>
>>>  On 12.11.2012 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  OK, when I looked closer at the Trac files it seems that they do
>>>>> minify some of it after all. Are we happy to maintain this as another
>>>>> difference between our copy of Trac and upstream?
>>>>>
>>>>>  The important question is, are the files minified in the Trac
>>>> repository, or in their release tarballs? If it's in the repo, well
>>>> then, my interpretation is that you're just shipping Trac with a few
>>>> patches (and I expect those patches aren't in the minified code). If
>>>> it's just in the release tarballs, then I expect the upstream import
>>>> went awry and needs to be fixed.
>>>>
>>>> -- Brane
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  It would appear that there is minified code direct in the Trac
>>> repositories. See http://trac.edgewall.org/****
>>> browser/trunk/trac/htdocs/js/<http://trac.edgewall.org/**browser/trunk/trac/htdocs/js/>
>>> **jquery.js<http://trac.**edgewall.org/browser/trunk/**
>>> trac/htdocs/js/jquery.js<http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/trac/htdocs/js/jquery.js>>for
>>> instance.
>>>
>>>
>>> I suspect we will need a few more opinions from IPMC members to be sure
>>> that this argument is enough to make the problem go away. I don't
>>> particularly want to have to maintain more differences from upstream but
>>> I
>>> prefer to get the correct approach in place here.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>      Gary
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Joe Dreimann
UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/>
*
*
*Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN
HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *




-- 
Joe Dreimann
UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/>
*
*
*Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN
HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message