incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joachim Dreimann <joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)
Date Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:38:10 GMT
+1 (non-binding)

Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC members
if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all?
The minimum required 72 hours have also passed.

We'd really like to establish a frequent release cycle, Bloodhound 0.3 is
already ready to be packaged up as soon as 0.2 has been released.

Thanks,
Joe


On 31 October 2012 21:49, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann
> <joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com> wrote:
> > The result of the vote is summarised here:
> >   http://markmail.org/thread/zrgkleendiqvanzs
>
> This message didn't include an IPMC tally, but I see that Mentor Branko
> ─îibej
> voted on the bloodhound-dev thread.  That makes one IPMC member voting +1;
> two
> more are needed.
>
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Less than a day left... any takers?
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>



-- 
Joe Dreimann
UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/>
*
*
*Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN
HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message