incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating
Date Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:17:51 GMT
Carol,
There are usually two licenses - for a source release and for binary
distribution. Was the agreement you mentioned about source release
license?

--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/1/12 7 :36AM, "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hello OmPrakash,
>>
>>I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache License:
>>
>>1. The second entry for Apache license.
>>2. Something like BSD license.
>>
>>The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
>>resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
>>
>>So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
>>release?
>
> This is the LICENSE file for Apache Flex which was reviewed by our mentors
> prior to the release of Apache Flex 4.8.0-incubating.  If I am not
> mistaken, this is the format that Apache and Adobe agreed to when Adobe
> donated the code to Apache.
>
> Carol
>
>>
>>--
>>With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>http://dataved.ru/
>>+7 916 562 8095
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with
>>>>the Apache
>>>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
>>>>
>>>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
>>>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
>>>>dependencies.
>>>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
>>>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
>>>>
>>>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
>>>>
>>>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
>>>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
>>>>    - SwfObject
>>>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
>>>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
>>>>
>>>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
>>>>
>>>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
>>>>    - Adobe embedded font support
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org list.
>>>> The
>>>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
>>>>voting
>>>> thread:
>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
>>>>
>>>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
>>>>
>>>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>>>> available here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
>>>>
>>>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
>>>>kit
>>>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available
>>>>here:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Here is the tag for the release:
>>>>
>>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-fl
>>>>ex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
>>>
>>> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
>>> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
>>> under just one of them.
>>>
>>> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
>>>good.
>>>
>>> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
>>> in the source archive - is that intentional?
>>> If so, why is it in the tag?
>>>
>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
>>> public PGP key servers.
>>>
>>> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
>>> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
>>> in the source archive.
>>> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
>>> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
>>> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> OmPrakash Muppirala
>>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message