incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Om <bigosma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating
Date Thu, 01 Nov 2012 18:28:32 GMT
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>wrote:

> I have also found the following line of code:
> > ./installer/src/InstallApacheFlex.mxml:                 var
> licenseWindow:AdobeLicense = new AdobeLicense();
>
> Shouldn't you use new ApacheLicense() here?
>
>
There are some dependencies we download during the installation of the Flex
SDK which have an Adobe License.  In this case we show the Adobe License
screen/webpage to the end user.

Thanks,
Om


> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello OmPrakash,
> >
> > I have notices that the LICENSE file has few additions two Apache
> License:
> >
> > 1. The second entry for Apache license.
> > 2. Something like BSD license.
> >
> > The first item I cannot understand completely, the second one can be
> > resolved by adding BSD-like licensed files during build.
> >
> > So the question is why do you use non-standard LICENSE for the source
> release?
> >
> > --
> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> > http://dataved.ru/
> > +7 916 562 8095
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with
> the Apache
> >>> Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application.
> >>>
> >>> The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy,
> >>> single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK and all its
> dependencies.
> >>>  This will make it suitable for working with   IDEs such as Adobe Flash
> >>> Builder, FDT, IntelliJ IDEA, FlashDevelop, etc.
> >>>
> >>> The application downloads the following dependencies:
> >>>
> >>>    - The AIR sdk (Windows vs. Mac) based on the current platform
> >>>    - Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
> >>>    - SwfObject
> >>>    - Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)
> >>>    - Adobe Text Layout Format (TLF)
> >>>
> >>> Optionally, the application will download these files as well:
> >>>
> >>>    - Adobe BlazeDS
> >>>    - Adobe embedded font support
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This release was voted upon on the flex-dev@incubator.apache.orglist.  The
> >>> vote passed with 11 binding and 5 non-binding votes.  Here is the
> voting
> >>> thread:
> >>> http://markmail.org/thread/nbrflol6mkpu65ry
> >>>
> >>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/
> >>>
> >>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> >>> available here:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC9/binaries/
> >>>
> >>> The PGP keys of the two release managers - OmPrakash Muppirala (Source
> kit
> >>> + Windows binaries) and Erik de Bruin (Mac binaries) are available
> here:
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Here is the tag for the release:
> >>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/tags/apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-RC9
> >>
> >> There are 3 directories under that tag; I would expect to find the
> >> NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files at the top level rather than
> >> under just one of them.
> >>
> >> The files do end up at the top level in the source archive, which is
> good.
> >>
> >> Also, the installerBadge directory tree does not appear to be included
> >> in the source archive - is that intentional?
> >> If so, why is it in the tag?
> >>
> >> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal
> >> public PGP key servers.
> >>
> >> Some of the source files don't have an EOL at EOF (e.g.
> >> ApacheFlexToolsStyle.css) in the SVN tag whereas they do have an EOL
> >> in the source archive.
> >> This is a packaging error, which can be sorted by ensuring that source
> >> files always have an EOL at EOF, or by changing the packaging
> >> instructions to not add the missing EOLs.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please vote:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1  approve
> >>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message