incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal
Date Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:49:32 GMT
On 3 November 2012 17:22, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:

> 2012/11/3 Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org>:
> > Hi again Mohammed,
> >
> > one think I am curious about the Git management for Mayhem is how to
> > handle the fact that Mayhem is composed by components, like apache
> > commons, each component has his own lifecycle.
> >
> > While on SVN I would have imported components in a structure like
> >
> > trunk
> >  `- component1
> >  `- component2
> >  `- component3
> >  `- component4
> > tags
> >  `- component1-0.1
> >  `- component1-0.2
> >  `- component2-0.1
> >
> > how the same structure can be replicated in Git? I am asking because I
> > noticed on [1] that commons components have 1 git repo for each
> > component.
> AFAIK not possible (git is poor for supporting such sparse checkout mode).
> So we (infra folks) will have to maintain one git repo per component
> and create a new git repo for each new component (IMHO a pain ..).
> In some case git is probably nice but not here !
> We have very similar situation in maven projects (with some components
> which have their own lifecycle) and we decided to not move those parts
> to git.
>

YET

you forgot the YET.

We may still decide to move them to git ;-)


> But hey what is most important build a community around cool
> code/projects or being able to use the last "à la mode" scm tool ?
>
> >
> > Many thanks in advance, all the best!
> > -Simo
> >
> > [1] http://git.apache.org/
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> > http://www.99soft.org/
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Hi Mohammed!
> >>
> >>> IMO it would be easier to move into a Git repository, which I will
> help in
> >>> setting it up. IMO, it will also be helpful for ASF Git support to have
> >>> more projects using Git which will help us understand different needs
> and
> >>> use cases of different project to provide better Git support by time,
> by
> >>> better I mean that now it is really good IMO but for sure we can make
> it
> >>> better :)
> >>
> >> agreed! can you update the reference in the proposal, please? TIA!!!
> >>
> >>>
> >>> The thing is we still need to have SVN for content related operations
> like
> >>> website and so cause it needs to be published using SVN pub-sub. I will
> >>> collect more details about that
> >>>
> >>
> >> thanks a lot! Can we propose the site be published on Git, like we
> >> already did on GitHub in the `gh-pages` branch? WDYT?
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >> -Simo
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >> http://www.99soft.org/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message