incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: Committership of a podling
Date Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:01:12 GMT

On Nov 22, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:

> Craig L Russell wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 14:16:28 -0800:
>> If there is a difference between committers and PMC members of a  
>> graduating podling, I don't think there is any process for identifying  
>> which podling committers are to become new-project committers. It is not 
>> in the board resolution. So it's up to the PMC to resolve.
> 
> +1
> 
>> 
>> I'd suggest having only the PMC members as initial committers and then  
>> have the new PMC vote on adding podling committers to the new project  
>> committer list. The vote could be a mass vote if no controversy...
> 
> No vote is needed, people simply retain their karmas.

Please retain karma. In both the just graduated OpenOffice and pending Flex projects the new
PMC has retained all committers.

If the PMC wants to remove any committer karma then they should request this in their JIRA
issues, or the PMC chair can do it while testing their new Chair karma.

Regards,
Dave


> 
> (OT: really, "No vote is needed" is a phrase that needs to be heard
> more.  If there is a "[DISCUSS] Joe Citizen for committership" thread
> with 10 +1's over three days, there is _no need_ for a [VOTE] thread ---
> consensus has been established, just go ahead and send The Invitation.)



> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message