incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Friedrich <m...@mafr.de>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Crunch 0.4.0 (incubating) RC1
Date Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:59:15 GMT
Hi Luciano,

thank you for your review! Unfortunately, I can't do anything about
0.4.0, the artifacts got published a couple of hours after I closed
the vote. Next time I'll set a longer voting period to give everyone
the chance to review in time.

However, we're of course willing to fix this as quickly as possible.
May I add you as a watcher to the issue [1]? I could really use your
expertise on this, it seems not even all TLPs get this right.

Thanks,
  Matthias

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-115

On Friday, 2012-11-16, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Friedrich <matt@mafr.de> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the vote passes with 3 +1 IPMC votes:
> >
> >  +1 Roman Shaposhnik (voted on crunch-dev)
> >  +1 Doug Cutting
> >  +1 Patrick Hunt
> >
> > No other votes were cast; the release has been approved.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your time, it's much appreciated!
> >
> > Regards,
> >   Matthias
> >
> > On Tuesday, 2012-11-13, Matthias Friedrich wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
> > > Apache Crunch 0.4.0 (incubating). This is the second release candidate
> > > of our second release at Apache, and it fixes the following issues:
> > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313526&version=12323244
> > >
> > > Our vote thread on crunch-dev:
> > >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-crunch-dev/201211.mbox/%3C20121113173454.GA3000%40mafr.de%3E
> > >
> > > We already collected one IPMC vote from Roman Shaposhnik (thanks!),
> > > so we still need two more votes.
> > >
> > > Please download, test, and vote by November 16th at 18:00 UTC.
> > >
> > > Release artifacts:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~mafr/apache-crunch-0.4.0-incubating-rc1/
> > >
> > > Maven staging repo:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrunch-034/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon:
> > >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crunch.git;a=commit;h=91e6c96899f85245255476f0a5e7d5feb48ddac0
> > >
> > > PGP keys for the Crunch team:
> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/group/crunch.asc
> > >
> > > Some basic release validation checks:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CRUNCH/Validating+a+Release
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >   Matthias
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> I know this vote has already been closed, but I see that the binary
> distribution have the following jars :
> 
> avro-1.7.0.jar
> avro-mapred-1.7.0.jar
> commons-io-2.1.jar
> commons-lang-2.4.jar
> guava-11.0.2.jar
> hamcrest-core-1.1.jar
> jansi-1.4.jar
> javassist-3.12.1.GA.jar
> jline-2.9.2.jar
> jsr305-1.3.9.jar
> junit-4.10.jar
> mockito-all-1.9.0.jar
> paranamer-2.3.jar
> scala-compiler-2.9.2.jar
> scala-library-2.9.2.jar
> snappy-java-1.0.4.1.jar
> 
> Hamcrest seems to be BSD License
> http://code.google.com/p/hamcrest/source/browse/trunk/hamcrest-java/LICENSE.txt
> 
> JSR305 seems to be New BSD License
> http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/
> 
> Mockito seems to be MIT License
> http://code.google.com/p/mockito/
> 
> Paranamer seems to be BSD License
> http://svn.codehaus.org/paranamer/trunk/LICENSE.txt
> 
> 
> But the binary distribution license only mentions Apache License 2 and
> Scala License for Scrunch launcher script.
> 
> That's why I think it's good practice to list the dependencies jars and
> it's dependencies on the binary distribution JAR.
> 
> I'd have personally -1 this release until these issues got at least fixed
> in trunk.
> 
> Note that I haven't checked all the 3rd party distributions and actually if
> those licenses require any info put in the NOTICE file.
> 
> -- 
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message