Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F5E6DAF6 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31757 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2012 13:35:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31467 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2012 13:35:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31456 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2012 13:35:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:35:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:35:11 +0000 Received: by vcbfy27 with SMTP id fy27so6135555vcb.6 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:34:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=E1hVoYnqPx1vDflNPA3aLQlJqwLTj9wcdYPaIqjjiMk=; b=yQy+5BAnl/Z4miKdyFKq5SFjlVEfrcuu/W0/soKGeknO1hqYdAIEVCf+Ar/Yt9vzi1 s3jb9XBO2accJTpIkaHUrurRfhQT6Uxe8Sm7v/u/npYbZBEv5YBeLsjmHYreaoFhSKkg RRxCDfMGBOH32zl7sUjCbm+MF1j5D3/Yof5wr42UKCzrh0wTSehb0b6kPj4TvBuyrNpu OrMcZN3a1qVxH/vglEe4hayzsUZR08Hv4V/zuFfhCIcCRHdcB/0jCdGj+7nW6JqzqYvw wcyFJ56i4t37DjK1cktQSG3k9WwCfnmg14quT02KpHKMqvHVJSbT3B0IaB+DldpDg1Bb /6mg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.17.75 with SMTP id m11mr11302402vdd.106.1345556091033; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.235.166 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:34:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1345500234.7229.10.camel@sybil-gnome> <50335AD5.7030903@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:34:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote From: Benson Margulies To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I would like to offer a very loud +1 to Bertrand's email. Here we are on a community graduation vote thread. This sub-discussion would seem to lead to one of three outcomes: 1) No place new. AOO proceeds out of the incubator operating under the current regime, and those AOO community members who are already engaged in discussions with infra and others about the preconditions for formal binary releases continue -- taking Bertrand's suggestion. 2) The community votes to stay in the incubator until a binary release plan exists. I can't see why this has any attraction for the community. 3) The community, or a subset thereof, takes their marbles and sets up shop in some other environment where binary releases are well-established. Before people start throwing things at me, I want to emphasize that (3) is offered only for completeness. If (1) is the order of the day, and an IPMC vote comes around soon, I'll be voting in favor of graduation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org