Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 835ACDC95 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71781 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2012 13:18:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71531 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2012 13:18:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71522 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2012 13:18:51 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:18:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username bdelacretaz, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:18:51 +0000 Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so3570075lag.6 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:18:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.109.212 with SMTP id hu20mr3631272lab.3.1345555129410; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.151.100 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:18:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50335AD5.7030903@gmail.com> References: <1345500234.7229.10.camel@sybil-gnome> <50335AD5.7030903@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:18:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:54 AM, J=C3=BCrgen Schmidt wrote: > ...As one of the active developers I would have a serious problem if we a= s > project couldn't provide binary releases for our users. And I thought > the ASF is a serious enough institution that can ensure to deliver > binaries of these very popular end user oriented software and can of > course protect the very valuable brand OpenOffice that the ASF now owns > as well... As has been repeatedly mentioned in this thread and elsewhere, at the moment ASF releases consist of source code, not binaries. OTOH I don't think anybody said the ASF will never allow projects to distribute binaries - but people who want to do that need to get together (*) and come up with a proposal that's compatible with the ASF's goals and constraints, so that a clear policy can be set. A related discussion is ongoing on infra-dev [1] about signing artifacts, where we also have suggested that people get together and express their requirements in a constructive way instead of complaining. -Bertrand (*) Earlier in this thread, I have suggested using legal-discuss + LEGAL jira issues to manage this cross-project discussion. The pmcs@ alias + this list can be used to invite all projects and podlings to join such a discussion. [1] http://s.apache.org/signing_reqs --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org