incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
Date Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:04:18 GMT
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>> Per the IPMC's "Guide to Successful Graduation" [1] this is the
>> optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
>> willingness/readiness to govern ourselves.  If this vote passes then
>> we continue by drafting a charter, submitting it for IPMC endorsement,
>> and then to the ASF Board for final approval.   Details can be found
>> in the "Guide to Successful Graduation".
>>
>> Everyone in the community is encouraged to vote.  Votes from PPMC
>> members and Mentors are binding.  This vote will run 72-hours.
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1  Apache OpenOffice community is ready to graduate from the
>> Apache Incubator.
>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>> [ ] -1  Apache OpenOffice community is not ready to graduate from the
>> Apache Incubator because...
>
> In my opinion, the issue of binary releases ought to be resolved before
> graduation.
>
> If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a hard requirement,
> then it seems to me that the ASF is not yet ready for AOO and will not be
> until suitable infrastructure and legal institutions to support binary
> releases (sterile build machines, artifact signing, etc) have been created
> and a policy has been endorsed by the Board.
>
> One possibility discussed in the past was to have downstream commercial
> vendors release binaries a la Subversion's example, which would
> obviate the need for all the effort and risk associated with providing support
> for ASF-endorsed binaries.  For whatever reason, the AOO podling seems not to
> have gone this direction, though.
>

Let's look at the the TLP's that the IPMC has recommended, and the ASF
Board has approved in recent months.  Notice that a fair number of
them releae source and binaries, as does the OpenOffice podling:

Apache Lucene.Net -- releases source and binaries

Apache DirectMemory -- releases source only

Apache VCL -- releases  source only

Apache Hama --  releases source and binaries

Apache MRUnit --  releases source only

Apache Giraph -- releases source only

Apache ManifoldCF -- releases source and binaries

So I'm not quite sure in what way the ASF "is not ready" for a TLP
that releases binaries, or what additional legal or procedural work
needs to be done to enable this.  As far as I can tell ASF projects
release binaries today.

I agree, sterile buildbots and code signing are good things to have,
and we are working with Infra on this today, and would continue to
peruse these avenues as a TLP.

In any case, shouldn't the question be whether the podling is ready
for the ASF rather than whether the ASF is ready for the poding? ;-)

-Rob


> Marvin Humphrey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message