incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence
Date Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:48:27 GMT
Hi,

On Tuesday, August 14, 2012, Benson Margulies wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > Just because it was released doesn't mean that it correctly did that.
> >
> > Need to confirm that all copyright owners of any pre-Apache code
> > either signed ICLA/grants with us, or that the source was already
> > licensed under a category A license.
>
> I volunteered to deal with all this as an expansion of a Shepherd
> assignment. I confess that I'm feeling a bit whelmed.
>

FWIW, here's how I'd approach this:

* Look at the original Kato proposal (
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KatoProposal) for insight on what
pre-Apache IP was supposed to be transferred to us.
* Check the early Kato svn history for commits containing that IP (see
especially revision 754956,
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=754956).
* Follow the pointers to the relevant records under
/repos/private/documents to verify that the mentioned paperwork is in place.
* If it indeed is, mark the IP as cleared on the Kato status page.
* If it isn't, consider whether the ICLA on file for the committer who
submitted the IP is sufficient to grant as the rights to keep the code.
* Based on all the above, make an informed judgement call on whether we can
keep the code in svn or not.

I hope this helps! If still needed, I'd be happy to help out in a few weeks
when I'm back from vacation.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message