incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence
Date Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:26:23 GMT
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/kato.html should have a check mark for:
>
> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>
> Just because it was released doesn't mean that it correctly did that.
>
> Need to confirm that all copyright owners of any pre-Apache code
> either signed ICLA/grants with us, or that the source was already
> licensed under a category A license.

I volunteered to deal with all this as an expansion of a Shepherd
assignment. I confess that I'm feeling a bit whelmed.

>
> Hen
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Benson Margulies
> <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Henri,
>>
>> Ant pointed out that Kato released. Where is the signoff you are looking at?
>>
>> --benson
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist
item:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009-02-09  kato
>>>>> 2009-02-13  stonehenge
>>>>> 2009-05-13  socialsite
>>>>> 2010-05-19  amber
>>>>> 2010-09-05  nuvem
>>>>> 2010-11-12  kitty
>>>>> 2010-11-24  stanbol
>>>>> 2011-06-13  openofficeorg
>>>>>
>>>>> Said checklist item is:
>>>>>
>>>>>  "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
>>>>> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
>>>>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, there was no code grant/donation for Kitty. So, there was no code grant.
If that means I should indicate the 'papers have been received', I can do that.
>>>
>>> Thanks Kevan :)
>>>
>>> I've updated kitty.xml to say n/a rather than a date as that's the
>>> method that's been used in the past to identify no need for
>>> grant/donation.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message