+1.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Which better agrees with written policy anyway- the sigs
> are part of the release package to be voted on and voted on
> by the PMC, so even tho it constitutes individual sigs
> those sigs (well at least the RM's sig) are PMC-approved.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com>
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
>>
>> On Aug 27, 2012 9:57 AM, "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jagunet.com>
>> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> But recall in all this that even when the PMC releases code, it is
>>> signed by the individual RM, and not by the PMC itself.
>>
>> Apache Subversion releases tend to have a half-dozen signatures. Thus, I'd
>> say they are signed by the PMC. For example:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/subversion-1.7.6.tar.bz2.asc
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|