incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Board will be proposing a new TLP
Date Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:02:37 GMT
On Jul 2, 2012 11:20 AM, "ant elder" <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com
>wrote:
>...
> From the SVN history it looks like there are quite a few of those others
> who have done work on the code in the past, is there a reason they aren't
> on the proposed PMC, were they invited and declined or something?

The idea of getting this code out to the public hasn't been broadly
discussed yet. It will be pretty obvious as a TLP :-)

I'll be doing the work to extract the Apache Steve code from the private
repository and get it into the public one. I'll look to see who we're
missing (eg. Roy).

> Seems a
> shame to change the code to be read-only to so many who've already worked
> on it in the past. Is it going to be easy for others to get commit access
> again, perhaps as easy as I'm led to believe Subversion partial committers
> is?

Ha! As long as I'm on the PMC, you can count on that. I strongly believe
most PMCs are too rigid with commit access. And the communities that do RTC
via Jira... ridiculous with access. There is no way a person can screw up
the project in RTC, yet they withhold access, and cite all kinds of reasons
for doing so. In reality, they are simply excuses for *exclusionary*
behavior. I have yet to see a valid reason from those communities, but I
have little recourse to get them to fix their behavior.

So Ant: you wanna be on the PMC or have commit? :-)

Cheers,
-g

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message