incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martijn Dashorst <>
Subject Vote or embedded in discussion? (was Re: [VOTE] Retire AWF from incubation)
Date Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:44:10 GMT
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Roger Schildmeijer
<> wrote:
> The AWF community has voted to retire the project.
> Following the retirement guide [1], I now call the Incubator PMC to
> vote on confirming this decision. (Will be open for 72 hours).

As a drive-by interested party in the incubator (with a couple of
mentored podlings) I noticed something that struck me as a bit off.

I just looked through the archives to see what was happening as AWF
has been in the incubator for not too long and I couldn't find the
vote to retire the project you mentioned.

I noticed that you did not undertake a formal vote but rather relied
on a note as a reply for a board report notification [1]. While the
mentors did acknowledge a +1 for retirement, I think retirement of
your development effort should not be discussed under the rug.

A subject "Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jul 2012 ([ppmc])"
sounds a lot less noticeable than "[DISCUSS] Retire AWC" or "[DISCUSS]
No future for AWC development".

In any case if the project really is dead in the water I would not
expect a discussion from my proposed headlines as well, but that would
at least have given lurking community members "to speak up now".

Anyways, onwards with retirement.



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message