incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Fwd: [ANN] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC3-incubating released
Date Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:23:11 GMT
Aplogize for joining the discussion late, but

> Here, I would argue that unless we have some written direction about what
> release numbering scheme  the incubating should use at The ASF, then
> whatever a project decides to use is fine.

+1

nothing to add :)
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I wish the proposal made my Jukka includes this matter.
>
>
> Le 7/27/12 11:32 AM, sebb a écrit :
>
>> On 27 July 2012 08:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgrosso@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27/07/2012 08:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Le 7/27/12 1:02 AM, Joe Schaefer a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Bill is complaining not about the venue,
>>>>> but the choice of referring to this package as
>>>>> a "release candidate" instead of simply dropping
>>>>> the "RC" portion of the package name like other
>>>>> projects typically do with approved candidates.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah, ok. Makes sense then.
>>>>
>>>> My perception is that the Syncope guys are trying to cut a 1.0.0,
>>>> instead
>>>> of going through many 0.x.0 before, therefore they are iterating on RC
>>>> atm.
>>>
>>>
>>> Indeed, yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>> It's pretty much semantic, IMHO.
>>
>> In other ASF projects I've seen, the convention is to use -alpha1 or
>> -beta2 etc. to designate such stages.
>>
>> Release Candidate (RC) has a specific meaning in the ASF, as it is
>> what is voted on before release.
>>
>> So one would vote on
>>
>> 1.0.0-beta3-incubating-RCn
>>
>> and a successful vote would result in the release of
>>
>> 1.0.0-beta3-incubating
>>
>> A failed vote for RCn would normally result in trying again with RCn+1
>> to address the cause of the failure.
>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>> Do incubator peeps think it's a wrong approach?
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope it's not: anyway, this RC3 should be the last one before actual
>>> 1.0.0-incubating.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>
>>> ASF Member, Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message