Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DB9ED6AA for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25830 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2012 23:27:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25644 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2012 23:27:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25635 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2012 23:27:01 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:27:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-gg0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:27:01 +0000 Received: by ggnp4 with SMTP id p4so1039753ggn.6 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:27:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.117.71 with SMTP id kc7mr27174000obb.62.1340321220140; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.7.226 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:27:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:27:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.1-incubating (Candidate 3) From: Chris Douglas To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04446a4d361e5204c303daad --f46d04446a4d361e5204c303daad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No. You have access to the same search functionality. Moreover, given the criteria that Kafka 0.7.0 was approved under, the burden of proof is on you to find references. Your musings on binaries are, as Martin pointed out, not legal arguments but preferences for clean downstream consumption. Even if I accept the goal, it is an insufficient reason for me to reverse my (binding) vote. The "binary artifacts" you refer to are jars from ASF projects and artifacts properly cited in the NOTICE/LICENSE files. The release is sound. You are, of course, welcome to vote against it because you believe that Kafka should go further, but the release violates no policy. -C On Thursday, June 21, 2012, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > > Great. We're not distributing the Snappy codec, so- according to the > > reasoning of board@, legal@, and the IPMC on the 0.7.0 release- the > > NOTICE and LICENSE files do not require updates. We're not starting > > from first principles at every release. > > Care to provide some reference for the board@, legal@ reasoning? > > --kevan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --f46d04446a4d361e5204c303daad--