incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <seba.wag...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:43:46 GMT
@Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?

About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license


"The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution statements
those licenses may require."
=> As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License I
would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.

Sebastian

2012/6/26 sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>

> On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <seba.wagner@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
> >
> > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> > Results:
> > PPMC:
> > aaf +1 (mentor)
> > solomax +1
> > eschwert +1
> > alvaro +1
> >
> > Wider Community: 3 times +3
> >
> > Result Vote Thread:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The Vote Thread:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
> >
> > Full Changelog:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
> >
> > Release artefacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
>
> The ASF releases source.
> Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
> There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
>
> The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
> them duplicated).
> It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
> in the LICENSE file.
> I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
>
> The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
> only to the content which is actually included.
> This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
> (unless the binary is created only from the source).
>
> The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
>
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
>
> The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
> for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
> The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
>
> As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
> source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
> refer to them.
>
> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message