Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4FAA11CD.3090409@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 08:42:21 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMOpY2hhcm55?= <elecharny@gmail.com>
Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating
References: <4FA7981E.8030403@apache.org>
 <CAOGo0VZU8qArhQpcLuOEN5M0W4SwszJ=o+3wF7813_WgB5ATqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FA8D596.7040809@apache.org>
 <CAOGo0VYW8bCUoCf5O-J7qz2oAt96x6-4sxcyyPPWH5a-jw4VyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FA90C57.90400@gmail.com>
 <CAOGo0VaeDO+MZYrxb9+1rmFLLjHwo59OhfvXVV9aHuPuzwYA2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOGo0VaeDO+MZYrxb9+1rmFLLjHwo59OhfvXVV9aHuPuzwYA2g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
> On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny<elecharny@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Comments inline
>>
>> Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
>>> On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò<ilgrosso@apache.org>    wrote:
>>>> Hi Sebb,
>>>> you can find my replies embedded below.
>>>>
>>>> I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
>>>> repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for
>>>> 1.0.0-RC1-incubating from scratch.
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The NOTICE file is very long; I suspect that not all of the entries are
>>>>> *required*.
>>>>
>>>> The LICENSE and NOTICE files were written against the parent POM: all the
>>>> dependencies with scope != test were considered, then.
>>> The N&L files must relate to what is actually included in the archive.
>>
>> We release sources, so making a distinction between scope != test
>> dependencies and scope=test dependencies does not make sense, AFAICT. If we
>> use a 3rd party product to test Syncope, then I think we must refer their
>> licenses in NOTICE and LICENSE.
> No, AIUI the N&L files only relate to what is being released, not any
> external dependencies.
See JDBM example in 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#note-license-and-notice. 
Typically, JDBM will be a dependencies, but still it requires you to 
include the needed references into N&L files.

I'm a bit lost here, as the idea is to allow users to download the 
source package we release, and not infringe any of the 3rd party 
software Licences, by including in our own N&L files what the 3rd party 
product requires us to include.

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org