Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40098CAA2 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 21:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59537 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2012 21:14:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59311 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2012 21:14:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 46562 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2012 19:01:10 -0000 Message-ID: <4FA2D5F3.5060701@apache.org> Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 12:01:07 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJ1bm8gTWFow6k=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120424 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org CC: Owen O'Malley , general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0 References: <4F9F4F6C.4000404@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/03/2012 08:06 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler >> wrote: >>> So you are suggesting expanding the charter to include projects not hosted at Apache? >> >> I don't think this is what Bruno suggested. Personally I can't find >> any reference in Bigtop >> charter that restricts it to Projects that belong to Apache Software >> Foundation. > > As a mentor of the Bigtop project, I don't see it as acceptable for an > Apache project to distribute binaries of non-Apache software. If the > owners of the Hue project decide to donate it to Apache and it had > been released by Apache, then it would be acceptable. I'm strictly -1 > on releasing any version of Bigtop with Hue or any other non-Apache > software as part of the release. > > -- Owen As part of mentoring Apache Bigtop (incubating) project, it would also be greatly appreciated if you would explain why this -1. Apache Bigtop (incubating) does not and will not include anything that does not belong to the Apache Foundation. So I am really confused as to why this strong reaction. The convenience artefact may pull Hue in, but this is in no way different from Apache Hadoop pulling in Google protocol buffer or Google guava. So again, how is this different? Is Apache Hadoop going to avandon Google Protocolbuffer? Furthermore as I just stated above, Apache Bigtop (incubating) does not and will not include any source of Hue. I am also confused on your definition of release since from my understanding, only source releases are voted on. And they won't contain Hue or any code that does not belong to the Apache Foundation. We don't check in any of our dependency, so I am confused about your statements. All of this is really no different from Apache Hadoop which pulls some non-Apache Foundation dependencies such as Google Protocolbuffer. Thanks, Bruno --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org