incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Shepherds for podling reports
Date Tue, 08 May 2012 17:49:34 GMT
Well, the Wiki page explicitly says that the chair will assign.

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> No such thing as "leftover". Doubling up (or more) is just fine.
>
> Q is whether there are some under-reviewed...
> On May 8, 2012 6:40 AM, "Benson Margulies" <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was late to volunteer. Do you have any leftover projects?
>>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ross Gardler <rgardler@opendirective.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I've done my shepherd reviews and made one comment (about Amber) on
>> > this list). I'm not sure where you want general observations recording
>> > but I have moved the projects to the recommended status category
>> >
>> > On 7 May 2012 21:03, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> >> On 5/4/2012 1:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> >>> In the Board agenda, we have a line where each Director can state they
>> have
>> >>> reviewed the report (before the meeting). They can also append queries
>> and
>> >>> comments. Little mini-discussions kinda happen in those comments.
>> >>>
>> >>> Point here is: provide a similar location for IPMC members (including
>> >>> shepherds) to list their review/approval. There is no strict need to
>> divvy
>> >>> the reviews. Jukka is doing that as a transitionary measure until
>> people
>> >>> get into it.
>> >>
>> >> The approach would require just a couple of things;
>> >>
>> >>  * designate a private report-review.txt file svn path which provides
>> svn
>> >>   notification to the incubator-private list.  Private, because both
>> personal
>> >>   and confidential questions may be asked and answered in the scope of
>> that
>> >>   approval/question/comment review file.
>> >>
>> >>  * populate that file each month with the list of reports.  Those
>> reports
>> >>   themselves could continue to persist in the wiki or could be
>> transfered
>> >>   into that internal edit/discuss report file.
>> >>
>> >> A comment to that svn review file would be broadcast, so that answers
>> and the
>> >> followup can either occur as a subsequent commit (asked and answered),
>> or can
>> >> evolve into an incubator-private mail list dialog (or be referred over
>> to the
>> >> podling-dev or podling-private list for clarification).
>> >>
>> >> In all I like the idea.
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>> > Programme Leader (Open Development)
>> > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message