incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Shepherds for podling reports
Date Tue, 08 May 2012 17:38:35 GMT
No such thing as "leftover". Doubling up (or more) is just fine.

Q is whether there are some under-reviewed...
On May 8, 2012 6:40 AM, "Benson Margulies" <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was late to volunteer. Do you have any leftover projects?
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ross Gardler <rgardler@opendirective.com>
> wrote:
> > I've done my shepherd reviews and made one comment (about Amber) on
> > this list). I'm not sure where you want general observations recording
> > but I have moved the projects to the recommended status category
> >
> > On 7 May 2012 21:03, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> >> On 5/4/2012 1:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> >>> In the Board agenda, we have a line where each Director can state they
> have
> >>> reviewed the report (before the meeting). They can also append queries
> and
> >>> comments. Little mini-discussions kinda happen in those comments.
> >>>
> >>> Point here is: provide a similar location for IPMC members (including
> >>> shepherds) to list their review/approval. There is no strict need to
> divvy
> >>> the reviews. Jukka is doing that as a transitionary measure until
> people
> >>> get into it.
> >>
> >> The approach would require just a couple of things;
> >>
> >>  * designate a private report-review.txt file svn path which provides
> svn
> >>   notification to the incubator-private list.  Private, because both
> personal
> >>   and confidential questions may be asked and answered in the scope of
> that
> >>   approval/question/comment review file.
> >>
> >>  * populate that file each month with the list of reports.  Those
> reports
> >>   themselves could continue to persist in the wiki or could be
> transfered
> >>   into that internal edit/discuss report file.
> >>
> >> A comment to that svn review file would be broadcast, so that answers
> and the
> >> followup can either occur as a subsequent commit (asked and answered),
> or can
> >> evolve into an incubator-private mail list dialog (or be referred over
> to the
> >> podling-dev or podling-private list for clarification).
> >>
> >> In all I like the idea.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> > Programme Leader (Open Development)
> > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message